To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
This is really bad news for Cranleigh. More development by a second rate builder with a third rate plan. At the risk of stating the blindingly obvious, Cranleigh’s infrastructure is already creaking at the seams and this will add to it. The development is needlessly close to the Downslink and drainage / flooding will be a serious issue in years to come. By Googling Gleesons they appear to have a poor reputation and build low quality homes,
Please let’s ensure that at the very least the Downslink is protected. The leaflet says “ALL EXISTING PUBLIC FOOTPATHS WILL BE RETAINED AND IMPROVED” Many of us will not was to see any stetch of the Downslink ‘IMPROVED’ by being turned into a tarmacked or lit path.
I assume all existing trees bordering the Downslink will remain and that (should the worst happen and permission be granted) the developers will plant more trees on the border of the development to improve screening from Hitherwood.